
Snow White
Cinderella
Aurora a.k.a. Sleeping Beauty
Ariel
Belle
Jasmine
Pocahontas
Mulan
There are also two franchise members that I am discounting, mainly because I haven't seen their respective movies (and because one was a CGI princess which just seems wrong, and the other has a romantic relationship with an amphibian, which seems still wronger). These are Tiana - the frog princess - and Rapunzel.
These animated characters have been idolized by little girls and gender-confused little boys the world over for generations, which I find very disturbing. I hold this point of view mainly because trying to emulate any of these fictional ladies and supposed role models would be catastrophic for whosoever attempted such a thing. They would face a number of problems which would preclude their seamless integration into modern society.
Problem number one that Disney princesses would face in modern culture: People become concerned if you habitually talk to animals.
Yeah, the Disney princesses, one and all, talk to either animals or inanimate objects on a regular basis. And it's not a "bad dog/good dog/who-wants-a-treat?" sort of exchange that's going on here. In pretty much every situation, the female lead characters of the Disney animated feature length films grow up socially isolated, and their best friends are animals. Animals that they talk to. And in some cases, these animals talk back, which is even creepier.


The second potentially problematic criterion for being a Disney princess: lack of any marketable skills.
You'd think that at least one of these fictional princesses would be spending her days learning about diplomacy or how to govern. But nope, all they seem to be able to do reliably is sing. That and whine about what's missing in their lives - which is usually a prince. Often the whining is set to music, thus combining their two skill sets. While, admittedly, Cinderella cleans floors like it's going out of style, she only does it up until she gets the fancy princess outfit and meets the prince. Also, you never see any of the princesses being in any way productive or trying to further their education (except Belle who apparently spends all her time reading fantasy fiction). Kids are watching these movies! Seems like the perfect opportunity to throw a little moral into the story. Maybe something along the lines of hard work paying off, amidst all the adventuring. Does there always have to be a genie or a prince or a not-very-well-explained magical spell swooping in to save the day? The only one of the movies with a nice training montage/song is - wait for it… - Mulan. Again. She runs away and joins the army, thus actually acquiring some useful skills to achieve her goals. Hard-core.
The third problem with Disney's princesses: all of their story's revolve around finding love, yet none of them seem to able have any sort of functional romantic relationships.

Ariel, for example, spends the majority of her movie stalking the very first man she ever sees who doesn't have a tail. Aurora goes nuts over the prince after meeting him in the forest, presumably because he's the first person she's ever seen that isn't an old lady or a bunch of woodland creatures pretending to be a person. Jasmine's introduction to her love interest involves following a random stranger and his pet monkey home to his isolated rooftop bedroom, which is definitely not a course of action that Disney should be promoting to young girls. While he seems nice enough, or at least doesn't rape and murder her, she can't even seem to recognize him once he changes clothes, so you have to wonder about the validity of the 'true love' happening there. Snow White's seven dwarves situation is not one that would translate well to the current idiom either. Shades of polygamy.

In conclusion, I find it sad that the only Disney princess who seems even moderately well-adjusted is the only one who is not actually a princess. She is neither the daughter of a king/native american chieftain, nor does she at any point in her movie marry a prince or king. Mulan is not a princess at all. She is, in fact, a transvestite. Who kicks Hun ass.
I think Esmerelda was pretty Bad Ass! She was pretty down to earth... Unfortunately she eventually couldn't resist the writers any more, and just had to fall for the best groomed knight in Paris.
ReplyDeleteBut up to that point, she wasn't your average princess. Her cause in the movie was actually pretty progressive. She might be the only princess to fight for social justice. She also didn't have any anthropomorphic friends. But then again she wasn't really a princess, as much as a gypsy-outcast person... til the end anyways.
~Courtland
Emily, you make so many good points! You've thought about this a lot...
ReplyDeleteI never noticed how many of them talk to animals...
I wish Disney would enlist the help of other writers. What if Roman Polanski wrote a Disney movie? or David Sedaris?
Oh yeah, Courtland! Esmeralda was pretty decent.
esmeralda was completely badass. she almost got burned at the stake! she didn't get included because of the whole not being a princess or part of the official disney princesses franchise, but she was almost as cool as mulan. fer sher.
ReplyDelete